The crisis around the Strait of Hormuz has sharply accelerated both short-term rerouting and longer-term pipeline planning, creating renewed political momentum behind several bypass routes.
Key takeaways:
Previous regional pipeline plans were repeatedly suspended or shelved due not only to prohibitive costs and logistical complexity, but also to the geopolitical challenges inherent in cross-border infrastructure. Inter-country pipelines, in particular, have historically proven difficult to advance, requiring sustained political alignment, security guarantees, and long-term cooperation between often competing states.
The current disruption, however, has fundamentally shifted that calculus. A new set of geopolitical incentives — driven by the war and the urgent need to mitigate reliance on the Strait of Hormuz — is reviving momentum behind projects that had long stalled. Looking ahead, several pipeline options could be expanded, reactivated, or newly built to reduce dependence on the Strait. All such projects, however, would require substantial capital investment and would likely take several years to come online.
Two bypass routes are already operating at high utilisation — Saudi Arabia's East–West (Yanbu) Pipeline and the UAE's ADCOP pipeline — allowing both countries to route exports around the Strait. The most immediately actionable steps would therefore centre on expanding capacity within these existing corridors: debottlenecking and enhancing the East–West Pipeline, and building additional parallel capacity alongside ADCOP to Fujairah. Crucially, these options avoid the political and logistical complexity of new cross-border infrastructure.
