Port congestion: A guide to measurement, impact, and management

Port congestion has become one of the most significant operational challenges facing global maritime supply chains. Whether you're optimizing vessel schedules, managing freight procurement, or planning terminal operations, understanding how to identify, measure, and respond to port congestion is critical for maintaining supply chain efficiency and controlling costs.

This guide answers the essential questions facing shipping lines, freight forwarders, beneficial cargo owners, port operators, and supply chain technology providers navigating today's complex port congestion landscape.

‍

What is port congestion and why does it matter?

Port congestion occurs when the volume of vessels seeking to call at a port exceeds the terminal's capacity to efficiently process them. This creates bottlenecks that cascade through global supply chains, affecting everything from vessel schedule reliability to inventory positioning to freight rates.

For commercial leaders across maritime and logistics, port congestion represents more than an operational inconvenience—it directly impacts revenue, costs, and customer satisfaction. A congested port can add days or weeks to transit times, increase demurrage and detention charges, disrupt production schedules, and force carriers to blank sailings or reroute vessels.

‍

How to identify port congestion

Identifying port congestion early provides crucial lead time for operational adjustments and strategic decision-making. The most visible sign is vessels waiting at anchor for berth allocation. When the number of vessels in a port's anchorage area increases significantly above normal levels, it indicates insufficient berth capacity to handle arriving volume. This is vessel queue analysis in action.

Berth waiting times tell the full story

This metric measures the time vessels spend at anchor before securing berth allocation. Major hub ports might average 6-12 hours during efficient periods. When berth waiting times extend to multiple days, that's significant congestion.

Container vessel turnaround time—the duration from vessel arrival to departure—provides another critical indicator. If vessels that normally complete port calls in 24-36 hours begin requiring 48-72 hours or more, terminal capacity constraints are causing delays.

Watch the yard

Container yards operating above 75-80% utilization struggle with positioning efficiency. High yard density forces additional container moves, slowing vessel loading and discharge operations. 

It's a vicious cycle: congestion creates high yard density, which creates more congestion.

Carrier schedule reliability matters too

Declining on-time performance for vessels calling at specific ports often indicates emerging congestion. If carriers serving a port begin experiencing significant schedule slippage, congestion is likely contributing.

Real-time monitoring systems aggregate vessel position data, port call information, and operational metrics to provide continuous visibility. Advanced platforms use AIS data to count vessels at anchor, calculate waiting times, and identify abnormal patterns indicating developing congestion. This is how leading organizations stay ahead of maritime disruption.

‍

How is port congestion measured?

Quantifying port congestion requires multiple metrics that together provide a comprehensive picture of terminal performance and capacity utilization.

Vessel count

Start with the basics: the absolute count of vessels at anchor. Comparing current vessel counts against historical averages for the same terminal and time period reveals whether congestion is developing.

Berth waiting time

Average berth waiting time aggregates time spent at anchor across all vessels calling at a terminal during a specific period. Tracking this metric over time shows congestion trends, with rising average waiting times indicating deteriorating port efficiency.

Container dwell time

Container dwell time measures how long containers remain in the terminal yard between discharge and pickup. Extended dwell times reduce effective yard capacity and contribute to congestion. Normal import dwell times range from 3-5 days at efficient ports, while congested terminals may see 7-10 days or longer.

Terminal productivity metrics include:

• Container moves per crane per hour (typically 25-35 moves for efficient operations)
• Vessel exchange rates showing overall operational throughput
• Gate turn times reflecting landside efficiency

Port call duration variance compares actual vessel turnaround times against scheduled or historical averages. A port where vessel calls extend 30-50% beyond normal durations experiences significant congestion. 

The most sophisticated approach is predictive congestion modeling at the terminal level. These systems use historical patterns, current vessel positions, and forecasted arrivals to predict congestion 6+ weeks in advance. Organizations using predictive models proactively adjust operations before congestion impacts their specific vessels or cargo.

Port authorities and terminal operators typically measure these metrics internally for operational management, but third-party maritime intelligence platforms aggregate data across thousands of ports to provide comparative benchmarking and global visibility.

‍

What causes port congestion?

Understanding root causes enables better congestion prediction and mitigation strategies. 

Supply & demand

Port congestion stems from supply-demand imbalances and operational inefficiencies, sometimes both simultaneously. Demand surge events overwhelm terminal capacity. For example, post-pandemic demand surges, pre-holiday shipping rushes, and front-loading ahead of tariff implementations create volume spikes that exceed infrastructure capacity. Terminals built for steady volume can't absorb sudden 30-40% increases.

Meanwhile, ultra-large container vessels compound the effect. These ships (18,000+ TEU capacity) discharge and load 3,000-5,000 containers per call, requiring extended berth time and straining yard capacity. When multiple mega-vessels arrive simultaneously, even well-managed terminals struggle.

The human factor

Labor shortages and disputes directly reduce terminal processing capacity. The congestion crisis at US West Coast ports in 2014-2015 and 2022, for example, resulted partially from labor negotiations reducing operational efficiency. No labor means no container moves.

Equipment constraints create bottlenecks, too, through limited crane availability, chassis shortages, and insufficient yard handling equipment. Terminals that lack modern automation or maintain aging equipment cannot match the productivity demands of modern vessel sizes.

Landside infrastructure matters

Inadequate rail connections, highway access constraints, and warehouse capacity shortages prevent containers from leaving terminals quickly. When containers can't exit efficiently, yard space fills and congestion develops. The problem isn't always at the berth, sometimes it's 50 miles inland.

Weather disruptions also force port closures or slow operations. When ports reopen, accumulated vessel backlogs create congestion until normal processing rates clear the queue. Hurricane season in the Gulf? Expect delays.

The domino effect

Network effects and cascade delays deserve special attention. Congestion at one major port causes vessels to miss schedule windows at subsequent ports, creating ripple effects across entire trade lanes. 

A vessel delayed by three days in Los Angeles arrives three days late to every port on its rotation. This is how local congestion becomes global disruption.

‍

What is the most congested port in the world?

Port congestion is dynamic, so the most congested port changes depending on seasonal patterns, trade volumes, operational disruptions, and infrastructure investments. However, several ports consistently experience significant congestion:

Shanghai and Ningbo-Zhoushan, China

China has the world's largest container ports by volume. Mega-ports such as Shanghai and Ningbo-Zhoushan periodically experience congestion during peak shipping seasons, COVID-19 lockdowns, and typhoon season. In 2022, Shanghai's two-month lockdown created massive congestion as vessels waited weeks for berth allocation.

Singapore

The world's second-largest container port by TEU volume handles 37+ million TEU annually through limited geographic space. During peak periods, berth waiting times can extend to several days.

Los Angeles and Long Beach, United States

The San Pedro Bay port complex experienced severe congestion from 2020-2022, with 100+ vessels at anchor and berth waiting times exceeding 20 days at peak. Infrastructure investments have since improved conditions, but the complex remains vulnerable during volume surges.

Antwerp and Rotterdam, Europe

European gateway ports experience seasonal congestion, particularly during Q3-Q4 peak shipping season and when labor actions disrupt operations.

What our data says

MarineTraffic data reveals that ports appearing as highly congested often don’t account for each terminal separately. This means congestion may or may not impact an operator, depending on whether their vessel is calling at a non-congested terminal.

For shipping lines, freight forwarders, and BCOs, identifying currently congested ports matters more than debating global rankings. Real-time congestion monitoring across your specific trade lanes enables proactive decision-making.

‍

What is a port congestion charge?

Port congestion charges—also called congestion surcharges or port congestion fees—are additional fees that carriers, freight forwarders, or terminal operators impose when congestion at a specific port increases operational costs.

During the 2021-2022 period, the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach experienced unprecedented congestion, with record numbers of container ships waiting at anchor for extended periods—in some cases weeks—before securing berth space. Major carriers responded by implementing temporary port congestion surcharges to offset increased operational costs from vessel delays and schedule disruptions.

Terminal congestion fees take different forms, such as peak period charges, reservation fees for guaranteed berth windows, and premium pricing during high-demand periods. Some terminals use pricing to manage demand, which is economically elegant, but financially painful.

Drayage companies add surcharges when severe port congestion increases gate turn times and reduces daily truck productivity. For example, if a driver completes two port moves per day instead of four, that revenue loss gets passed to shippers.

Port congestion charges remain controversial, as they pass congestion costs from service providers to cargo owners. However, from a carrier or terminal operator perspective, congestion charges reflect real cost increases that cannot be absorbed without passing them through the pricing structure.

‍

How are port congestion fees calculated?

The calculation methods vary significantly:

Cost-recovery method

Carriers calculate actual incremental costs from congestion, additional charter days, excess bunker consumption, and missed sailing recovery costs. They then allocate these costs across containers moving through the affected port. 

If, for example, congestion adds $500,000 in costs and 2,000 containers move through that port, the per-container surcharge would be $250.

Market-based pricing

Some carriers set congestion surcharges based on market conditions and competitive positioning rather than direct cost calculation. 

If the market accepts $800 per container surcharges, carriers may implement that level regardless of actual cost impact. 

Tiered structures make it complex

Congestion charges may scale with severity. For example:

• $200 per container for berth waiting times of 24-48 hours
• $500 for 48-72 hours
• $1,000+ for delays exceeding 72 hours

Regional aggregation does simplify the admin, with carriers implementing port congestion surcharges at a regional level (e.g., "US West Coast congestion surcharge") rather than port-specific charges. This addresses congestion costs across multiple facilities with a single fee structure.

Terminal congestion fees

Terminal congestion fees follow several different models, including peak-period pricing, density-based fees that apply when yard utilization exceeds specific thresholds, and dwell-time penalties for containers that remain in the terminal beyond their free time. Each of these approaches uses price signals to help manage demand.

‍

How does port congestion affect shipping freight rates?

Port congestion creates upward pressure on freight rates through multiple mechanisms. Understanding these connections helps explain why rates spike during congestion periods.

Congestion reduces vessel supply by trapping ships at ports

A vessel spending five extra days at Los Angeles cannot be deployed on revenue-generating voyages, reducing effective fleet capacity. When supply decreases while demand remains constant, rates increase. 

Schedule recovery costs add up quickly

Carriers often increase vessel speeds between ports to recover schedule delays caused by congestion, consuming additional bunker fuel. These incremental costs flow into freight rate structures, someone pays for that extra fuel.

Equipment imbalances create cascading problems

Congestion creates container equipment shortages at origin locations. When containers sit at congested destination terminals for extended periods, exporters at origin ports face equipment shortages, forcing carriers to reposition empty containers at significant expense. Empty container repositioning is pure cost with zero revenue.

The risk premium

During sustained congestion periods, carriers build risk premiums into freight rates to cover uncertainty around port call costs, schedule reliability penalties, and potential congestion surcharge mechanisms. Risk pricing reflects the unpredictability that congestion introduces.

Market psychology and negotiating leverage shift during severe congestion

When shippers have limited alternatives, carriers gain pricing power. The 2020-2022 period demonstrated this dynamic, severe congestion coincided with freight rates reaching historic highs. Multiple factors contributed, but congestion played a starring role.

Port pair pricing differentiation represents the newest strategy

Charging premium rates for congested ports while offering discounted rates for less congested alternatives. This approach manages demand by incentivizing shippers to consider alternative gateways. Smart routing can save serious money.

For freight procurement teams, understanding the port congestion-freight rate relationship enables better contract negotiations, budgeting accuracy, and routing optimization. Organizations that monitor congestion trends gain advance warning of potential rate increases, and can act before rates spike.

‍

Practical strategies for managing port congestion

While individual organizations cannot eliminate port congestion, proactive strategies minimize its impact. 

These include:

1. ‍Deploying visibility platforms: These track berth waiting times, vessel queues, and congestion indicators across your trade lanes. Early congestion detection enables proactive adjustments before delays impact your cargo. Real-time monitoring isn't optional anymore, it's a competitive advantage.‍
2. Evaluating alternative terminals: Analyze congestion, transit times, and total landed costs across alternative gateway ports. Sometimes routing through a less congested terminal 200 miles from your final destination costs less than using the closest congested gateway. ‍
3. Tracking schedule reliability and congestion response by carrier: Carriers with superior network planning and operational flexibility better manage congestion impact on your shipments. Not all carriers respond to congestion equally.‍
4. Increasing safety stock levels or advance order timing when serving markets through chronically congested ports: This buffer prevents congestion-related stockouts. The cost of extra inventory often pales compared to the cost of lost sales or production shutdowns.‍
5. Negotiating freight contracts: Those that limit congestion surcharge exposure, include schedule reliability performance guarantees, or provide compensation when delays exceed specified thresholds are recommended. Contractual protections work, if you negotiate them upfront.‍
6. Sharing forecasted demand information with carriers and forwarders earlier: Enable better vessel space planning and reducing the likelihood of last-minute capacity crunches that exacerbate congestion. Collaborative planning benefits everyone.

‍

Port congestion represents a persistent challenge in global maritime logistics, but organizations that understand how to identify, measure, and respond to terminal congestion, maintain competitive advantages through superior supply chain resilience and cost management. 

By monitoring congestion indicators, understanding its causes and cost implications, and implementing proactive mitigation strategies, commercial and operational leaders can navigate congestion challenges while maintaining supply chain efficiency and controlling costs.

‍